Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Finnish National Airline

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1965PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Desmond.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint under CPLR 3211, (a), 8 for lack of personal jurisdiction of defendant, a Finnish corporation, was denied at Special Term; the court holding that defendant’s activities in New York State constituted the transaction of business within the State. The. relevant statutes are CPLR 301 which says that: “ A court may exercise such jurisdiction over persons, property, or status as might have been exercised heretofore ”, and section 224 of the General Corporations Law (now Business Corporation Law, § 1314, subd. [a]) reading thus: “ An…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Elish v. St. Louis Southwestern RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Laufer v. OstrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Citigroup Inc. v. City Holding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  5. Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API