Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Provo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Delta. (Grant, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

The plaintiffs in this suit, who were doing business as timber merchants in Chicago, brought an action of replevin in the circuit court for Delta county on June 1, 1888, to recover a quantity of cedar ties, posts, poles, and logs.

The defendant was the sheriff of Delta county, and had possession of the cedar under two executions against Frederick M. Olmsted, issued upon judgments rendered *477in the Delta circuit; one in favor of William. J. Quan & Co. for §1,772.33 damages, and §106.05 costs, and one in favor of Gray, Kingman & Collins for §2,009.40, and §20 costs. The executions were issued May…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. CrowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Moore v. VroomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Frederick v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. L. Hudson Co. v. BarnettMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Flint v. TraheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API