Legal Opinion

Frederick v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

We are all of opinion that a peremptory mandamus should issue in this case.

The action out of which these proceedings arose was replevin brought by one Nathan Wolf against Frederick, who, as sheriff of Mecosta county, had served attachments against the goods of one Abram Markson. These attachments were three in number, issued on behalf of different plaintiffs, two of them bearing teste January 20, and one January 22, 1883. The sheriff seized the goods on the 23d of January, and afterwards, on the same day, Wolf replevied the goods from the-sheriff. Issue was joined in this cause, and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Close v. GillespeyNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  2. Cook v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Waldo v. SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1821
  4. Marsh v. BerryNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  5. Pennsylvania Mining Co. v. S. P. Brady & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Ginsburg v. McBrideMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Mead v. GliddenMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Mueller v. ProvoMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Berger v. ClippertMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API