State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} The issue presented for consideration in this appeal concerns whether the offense of theft is a lesser included offense of the crime of robbery. Appellate courts have reached different conclusions on this question, prompting us to resolve the issue. We hold that theft is a lesser included offense of robbery.
{¶ 2} The events giving rise to our current consideration arose on April 7, 2005, when Danielle Smith, Lashay Meadows, and Meadows’s children shoplifted merchandise from the Macy’s department store located in the Tri-County Mall in Hamilton County. On that day, Rachel Cornett, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KidderOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. DeandaOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. ClayOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Lloyd v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.