State v. Kidder
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
I
The main issue presented in this appeal is whether our per curiam decision in State v. Rohdes (1986), 23 Ohio St. 3d 225, 23 OBR 382, 492 N.E. 2d 430, in any way altered the statutory-elements test for determining lesser included offenses first announced in State v. Kuchmak (1953), 159 Ohio St. 363, 50 O.O. 327, 112 N.E. 2d 371. Although Rohdes did tend to cloüd the picture of this area of the law, we answer such query in the negative, for reasons which follow.
R.C. 2945.74 provides, in pertinent part:
“* * * When the indictment or information charges an offense, including different degrees,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by227 opinions
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ShaneOhio Supreme Court · 1992
222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.