Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2000No. 98-921PublishedCited by 174 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, Carter raises fourteen propositions of law. For the reasons that follow, we reject each of his propositions of law and affirm each conviction and the death sentence.

Missing Element in Indictment

In his first proposition of law, Carter argues that his death sentence is void because an element of the offense of rape was missing from the charge in the fourth count of the indictment. The fourth count alleged as follows: “THE JURORS OF THE GRAND JURY of the State of Ohio, within and for the body of the County aforesaid, on their oaths, in the name and by the authority of the State…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by174 opinions

  1. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012

169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API