Legal Opinion

White v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 18, 2000No. 00-0855PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

¶ 1. The principal issue in this worker's compensation case is whether the first clause of WiS. Stat. § 102.01(2)(g)2 (1997-98) 1 relieves an employee of the burden to prove that an occupational disease stemmed from the employment with the employer against whom the claim is made. The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) determined that the statute required the claimant, Gary J. White, to establish such linkage between his occupational back disease and his employment with Olympic Wall Systems, Inc. (Olympic). LIRC further held that the evidence submitted by White did not satisfy this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Minuteman, Inc. v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Stafford Trucking, Inc. v. State, Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Barron Electric Cooperative v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Langhus v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lloyd Frank Logging v. HealyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API