Legal Opinion

Lloyd Frank Logging v. Healy

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 30, 2007No. 2007AP692PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, EJ.

¶ 1. Lloyd Frank Logging and its insurance carrier, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (collectively, Lloyd Frank), appeal an order of the circuit court affirming a decision by the Labor and Industry Review Commission. The Commission concluded that Charles Healy was an employee of Lloyd Frank's because he did not fulfill the statutory definition of an employer. Lloyd Frank argues that Healy was an employer primarily because he purchased a worker's com pensation insurance policy. We reject Lloyd Frank’s argument as contrary to the statutes and, accordingly, affirm the order.

Background

¶…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bergmann v. McCaughtryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. DischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Stapleton v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. White v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. James R. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. James R. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. SpaethWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API