Legal Opinion

Broker v. Kolynos Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 12, 1946No. File 66074Published

1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.

The reasons of appeal take no exception to the subordinate facts disclosed by the finding and concern themselves only with the ultimate conclusion upon which the award is based, drawn from sudh facts. Under such circumstances, the transcript of the evidence submitted to the commissioner is irrelevant. Klautka v. Stanley Works, 100 Conn. 345, 347. Accordingly, its content is not considered. The fact of the plaintiff’s dependency upon the earnings of her deceased minor son, who admittedly died from injuries which arose out of and occurred in the course of his employment with the named…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Draus v. International Silver Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Klautka v. Stanley WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. O'Shea v. Remington-Rand, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API