Legal Opinion
O'Shea v. Remington-Rand, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The plaintiff’s minor son was killed in an industrial accident. The compensation commissioner found that plaintiff was a partial dependent of his son to the extent of $5 a week. The Superior Court upon appeal found that he was partially dependent to the extent of $18.80 a week. The Compensation Act provides that in case of fatal injuries the compensation received by a partial dependent shall be “half of the average weekly earnings of the deceased at the time of the injury, provided that the amount so paid shall not be more than twenty-one dollars weekly, nor less than five dollars weekly,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Driscoll v. Jewell Belting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Blanton v. Wheeler & Howes Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Draus v. International Silver Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Mahoney v. Gamble-Desmond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Broker v. Kolynos Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1946