Legal Opinion
Minnesota Building & Loan Ass'n v. Closs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 1931No. 27,776PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action of unlawful detainer in the municipal court of Minneapolis by the plaintiff building and loan association against the defendants Leo J. Gloss and Alfred Bundy. There was judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.
The plaintiff claims the right of possession after a forfeiture pursuant to G. S. 1923, § 9576, as amended, 2 Mason, 1927, id. of a contract in the form of an executory contract of sale to the defendant vendees of a lot in Minneapolis occupied by them as a homestead.- Such a contract, as we have held many times, makes the vendees equitable owners in fee and the vendor…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Niggeler v. MaurinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Randall v. ConstansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Stearns v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Abbott v. MoldestadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re Petition of S. R. A. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Westberg v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- In Re EhrichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- Austin S. & L. Ass'n v. First Nat. Bank of StewartvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.