Legal Opinion
In Re Westinghouse Electric Corp. Uranium Contracts Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided December 19, 1975No. 235PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before JOHN MINOR WISDOM, Chairman, and EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER * , JOSEPH S. LORD, III, STANLEY A. WEIGEL, and ANDREW A. CAFFREY, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.
Westinghouse Electric Corp. is the sole defendant in thirteen federal actions in as many districts 1 filed by a number of its utility customers. 2 Each of these actions, to a large extent, involves an alleged contractual obligation on Westinghouse's part for the present or future delivery of uranium to fuel nuclear power plants operated by the plaintiff-utilities or planned for operation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Republic National-Realty Equities Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Griseofulvin Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- In Re Midwest Milk Monopolization LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
- In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Papeete, TahitiUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Smith Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In Re Westinghouse Electric Corporation Uranium Contract LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Uranium Industry Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In re Western Electric Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.