Legal Opinion
In re Harvell
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 30, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Habeas Corpus. Petition by T. H. Harvell to procure the discharge of C. W. Harvell from custody in a county jail.
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, District Judge.
On September 16, 1920, T. H. Harvell, in behalf of C. W. Harvell, presented his petition, duly verified, alleging that C. W. Harvell was imprisoned in the county jail of New Hanover county and restrained of his liberty—
“by a government agent from the Department of Justice; * * * that the cause of such imprisonment or restraint, according to the knowledge and *998belief of the petitioner, is under the Mann Act [Comp. St. §§ 8812-8819], but no warrant or order of arrest, or other process, as this petitioner believes and alleges, has ever been issued; that no warrant has been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. KilpatrickDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1883
- United States v. RuroedeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1914
- State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- United States v. RembertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
- O'Connor v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1922
- State v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- United States v. DaisonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.