United States v. Kilpatrick
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Motion to Quash Bill of Indictment.
1Opinion of the CourtDick, J.
This case having been called for trial, the defendant filed an affidavit, upon which a motion was made to quash the indictment. After hearing evidence and full arguments I decided that the bill should be quashed, and the defendant be held to await the action of the grand jury, then in session, upon a now bill. As I was desirous of speeding an investigation and trial of the cause, I announced my conclusions of law orally, and stated that 1 would prepare a written opinion upon the important questions involved, so as to settle such matters of law, practice, and procedure in this district.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lewis v. . Commissioners of WakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- State v. Martha Matthews.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- State v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
3Cited by43 opinions
- De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- United States v. EdgertonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1897
- United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- Brack v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- United States v. RosenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.