Legal Opinion
Optimum Image, Inc. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 6, 1991No. 3262 and 3263PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
Optimum Image, Inc., (Optimum), appeals from an order of the trial court transferring its claim to the Pennsylvania Utility Commission, (PUC), for investigation, review and report, and from the court’s subsequent order denying its motion to amend its complaint and its motion for leave to file a nunc pro tunc demand for jury trial.
The facts may be summarized as follows: Optimum is a business engaging in retail and commercial photographic film developing. Optimum purchased sophisticated, computerized film developing equipment for use in its development processes. These machines…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Schriner v. Pa. Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Sweener v. First Baptist Church of EmporiumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Morrow v. BELL TELE. CO. OF PENNSYLVANIASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Industria Cortinera, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993
- Poorbaugh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Teleconcepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.