Legal Opinion

Wolff & Munier, Inc. v. Price-Waterhouse

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 9, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Wolff & Munier, Inc. and Con-troltec, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as Plaintiffs or WM) appeal from the order of the chancery court dismissing their complaint against the defendant, Price Waterhouse (hereinafter referred to as Defendant or PW). Although PW’s motion was filed pursuant to Rule 12.02, Tenn. R.Civ.P., it appears that matters outside the complaint were considered by the court, thus we will treat and dispose of the motion as a motion for summary judgment.

There is no dispute concerning the material facts. G.H. Avery Company (GHA) was a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. CollinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Worrall v. Kroger Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Craven v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Graves v. Anchor Wire Corp. of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Cohen v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Owens v. Truckstops of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Tip's Package Store, Inc. v. Commercial Insurance Managers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Autozone, Inc. v. Glidden Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  4. Owens v. Truckstops of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Tip's PackageStore, Inc. v. Commercial Ins. Mgrs., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API