Legal Opinion
Lovell v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 30, 1925No. 24,315PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, 0.
The trial court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, certified that an important and doubtful question was presented, and the defendant Marshall appealed. A condensed statement of the facts alleged follows:
The Wenatchee Valley Gas & Electric Company, referred to as the Wenatchee Company, was a corporation in the state of Washington engaged in the business indicated by its name. Its property was mortgaged to secure the payment of 651 bonds, each of the denomination of $1,000. The company was in default in the payment of the bonds and the holders appointed the plaintiffs as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Earle v. MaxwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Magnuson v. ClitheroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Everett v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Willison v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Maloney v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. MathesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Gile v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- O'Moore v. DriscollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Baufield v. WarburtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.