Legal Opinion

Arnold v. North Carolina

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 6, 1964No. 572PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioners, Arnold and Dixon, were found guilty of murder by a jury and their convictions were affirmed, the Supreme Court of North Carolina concluding that they had not made out a case of systematic exclusion of Negroes from the grand jury which returned the indictment. 258 N. C. 563,129 S. E. 2d 229. In support of their motion to quash the indictment because of consistent exclusion of Negroes from grand jury service, petitioners, both Negroes, offered testimony of the county tax supervisor showing that the tax records of the county, on which Negro and white persons are listed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Eubanks v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Peters v. KiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API