Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 8, 1993No. 92-1232; No. 92-1260PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Senior Circuit Judge.
The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals from a $177,477.71 judgment in favor of David Robinson, a former bus cleaner at SEPTA. Robinson claimed that SEPTA dismissed him from his job in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The district court determined that SEPTA had illegally discriminated against Robinson over the course of two years culminating with his termination on December 24, 1985.
On appeal, SEPTA challenges several of the trial judge’s factual determinations, the trial judge’s finding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- 64 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 250, 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,983 David Robinson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Red Arrow Division, No. 92-1232, David Robinson, No. 92-1260 v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Red Arrow DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- KUNTZMAN v. Wal-MartDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Clement v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Doe, Jane v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.