Legal Opinion
Hanover Insurance Company v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1967No. 65-Civ. 3770PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CROAKE, District Judge.
The complaint in this action alleges that plaintiff was a surety on performance and payment bonds executed on December 30, 1959 in connection with a federal construction contract, for work to be performed at the Maximum Security Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois. The bonds were issued pursuant to the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq., on behalf of Henry C. Pulley d/b/a Pulley & Sons Construction Co. (hereafter PULLEY) by Massachusetts Bonding And Insurance Company. 1
Plaintiff further contends that PULLEY failed to pay certain suppliers who had furnished…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- National Surety Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Newark Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Construcciones Werl, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1975
- Kennedy Electric Company, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Argonaut Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Argonaut Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.