Legal Opinion

Cappello v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is a motion by the defendants under rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice for an order dismissing the plaintiff’s amended complaint herein and directing the entry of judgment in favor of the defendants. The defendants move on the grounds that the amended complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant, Union Carbide & Carbon Corporation, and that the plaintiff is not the real party in interest because his cause of action against the defendant Electro Metallurgical Company, hereinafter called <£ Electro ”, has been assigned by operation of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Foley Bros., Inc. v. FilardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Coster v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Bristol Village, Inc. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2016
  3. Farrell v. American Beverage Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Cerp Construction Co. v. J. J. Cleary, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API