Legal Opinion
Zamir v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 5, 2017No. Case No.: 15-CV-408 JLS (DHB)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
(ECF No.-58)
Hon. Jams L. Sammartino, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Defendants Bridgepoint Education, Inc., Andrew S. Clark, and Daniel J. Devine’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“MTD,” ECF No. 58). Also before the Court are Lead Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to, (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 61), and Defendants’ Reply in Support of, (“Reply,” ECF No. 63), Defendants’ MTD. The Court vacated the hearing and took this matter under submission without oral argument…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.