Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 1934No. 29,594PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.
A sufficient statement of the case is made in a former appeal, reported in 187 Minn. 272, 245 N. W. 146, where the judgment was reversed and a new trial granted. The new trial resulted in a verdict for defendant. The action is to recover on an accident insurance contract issued to Arthur E. Palmer, payable to plaintiff Cora E. Palmer, his wife. The insured was found dead in his garage on October 24, 1930. The engine of his car on which he had been working was running. One of the defenses alleged was that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Modern Woodmen of America v. MixerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Anderson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Olgiati v. New England Box Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- Mooney v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Moeller v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. BeecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Woyak v. KonieskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.