Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 20, 1925No. 24,434PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 202 N.W. 341, 204 N.W. 957. On February 20, 1925, the following opinion was filed: Defendant, a fraternal insurance company, appeals from a judgment obtained upon its benefit insurance certificate issued to Ed. F. Mooney, payable to plaintiff, his wife, upon his death.

In his application for a certificate of insurance, Ed. F. Mooney agreed that "any beneficiary certificate based upon this application shall be held to be a contract made in the State of Illinois and subject to its laws." A certificate was issued on March 4, 1899, upon the express condition "that the said Ed. F.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Hartford Life Insurance v. IBSSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Steen v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Boynton v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Mooney v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. DeVore-Norton v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Palmer v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Ferris v. American Insurance UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Dotlich v. Slovene National Benefit SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API