Ercanbrack v. Crandall-Walker Motor Company

It was the defendant who selected its salesman and entrusted him with- the responsibility of procuring the plaintiff to sign the buyer’s order, and he signed it himself, upon a representation to the plaintiff that he had a contract to purchase the truck.1 In subsequent conferences about changes in price, similar representations were made to the plaintiff from October 25, 1973 until December of 1974, under the assumption that there was a binding contract. It was not until the impasse and disagreement occurred that the defendant then sprung the defense that the contract had not been accepted by…