Legal Opinion
State v. Hopkins
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 15, 2002No. 20215-1-III, 20320-4-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
55 P.3d 691 (2002)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Cheryl L. HOPKINS and Russell Alan Smith, Appellants.
Nos. 20215-1-III, 20320-4-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine.
October 15, 2002.
James E. Egan, Kennewick, WA, for appellants.
Andrew K. Miller, Terry J. Bloor, Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Kennewick, WA, for respondents.
KATO, A.C.J.
Cheryl L. Hopkins and Russell Alan Smith appeal their convictions for manufacturing and possession of methamphetamine. They contend police officers' search of outbuildings on Ms. Hopkins' property exceeded the scope of a lawful protective…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. SchafferIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- United States v. Mark Allen FordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HatchieWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HatchieWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State Of Washington v. Lovett James ChambersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.