State v. Sadler
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
¶1 Stanley Scott Sadler appeals his convictions of eight counts of sexual exploitation of a minor. Through counsel, he argues that the trial court erred when it (1) heard his Batson1 challenge in the jury room rather than the open courtroom, thereby violating his right to an open public trial; (2) denied his CrR 3.6 motion to suppress the evidence discovered in his residence; and (3) admitted his statements to law enforcement. In a pro se statement of additional grounds for review (SAG), 2 Sadler also argues that the statutory defense to the sexual exploitation of a *106minor charges, RCW 9.68A.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SublettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In re the Detention of TicesonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.