Legal Opinion

Boston and Maine Railroad v. Bethlehem Steel Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 4, 1963No. 6032_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for indemnity removed from the Massachusetts Superior Court. Plaintiff appellant, Boston and Maine Railroad, is a Massachusetts corporation; defendant appellee, Bethlehem Steel Company, is of Pennsylvania. Railroad maintains a spur track on Massachusetts premises of Bethlehem under a so-called sidetrack agreement, the legality of which is not questioned. New York Central R. R. v. William Culkeen & Sons Co., 1924, 249 Mass. 71, 144 N.E. 96. This agreement contains provisions for indemnity, portions of which are as follows:

“The Shipper [Bethlehem] hereby…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Dobry Flour Mills, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fireside Motors, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Premier Corporation v. Economic Research Analysts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  3. Druker v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1971
  4. Crystal River Enterprises, Inc. v. Nasi, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Rothey v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API