Boston and Maine Railroad v. Bethlehem Steel Company
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for indemnity removed from the Massachusetts Superior Court. Plaintiff appellant, Boston and Maine Railroad, is a Massachusetts corporation; defendant appellee, Bethlehem Steel Company, is of Pennsylvania. Railroad maintains a spur track on Massachusetts premises of Bethlehem under a so-called sidetrack agreement, the legality of which is not questioned. New York Central R. R. v. William Culkeen & Sons Co., 1924, 249 Mass. 71, 144 N.E. 96. This agreement contains provisions for indemnity, portions of which are as follows:
“The Shipper [Bethlehem] hereby…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Dobry Flour Mills, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fireside Motors, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Premier Corporation v. Economic Research Analysts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Druker v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1971
- Crystal River Enterprises, Inc. v. Nasi, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Rothey v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.