Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2003No. 28270PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Chief Judge.

Kevin Thompson appeals from a driver’s license suspension arising from his refusal to submit to a breath test following his arrest for driving under the influence. He asserts that the magistrate erred in suspending his driving privileges because the record did not support a finding that the arresting officer had legal cause to request that Thompson take a breath test. He also alleges that his due process rights were violated because he was not informed that he could not be charged for driving under the influence (DUI) if he passed a breath test.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Idaho, Department of Transportation v. Marvin GibbarIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. Martinez-GonzalezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. IrwinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. In Re Suspension of Driver's LicenseIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Peck v. State, Department of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API