Kelley v. State

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] The appellant contends that his constitutional right to equal protection of the laws was violated when the district court arbitrarily and capriciously did not grant him first-offender status under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-801 (LexisNexis 2007). Alternatively, he argues that the district court's denial of first-offender status was an abuse of discretion. We affirm.

ISSUES

[T2] The appellant states the issues substantially as follows:

1. Was the appellant treated arbitrarily and capriciously when he was denied the benefit of disposition of his case under Wyo. Stat. Ann. §…