Legal Opinion

Manes v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2004No. 02-160PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T1] Appellant Edward Manes entered two guilty pleas to drug-related charges without benefit of a plea agreement and received what he contends are harsh, consecutive sentences. At the sentencing hearing, the prosecutor presented evidence that Manes contends was unreliable and violated his due process right to a fair sentencing hearing. He requests remand for a new sentencing hearing.

[12] We affirm.

ISSUE

[13] Manes sole issue for our review is:

Whether Appellant's right to a fair sentencing hearing was violated?

FACTS

[14] Without a plea agreement, Manes pled guilty to one count of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gayler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Christy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. DeLoge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Coletti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Doherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Frederick v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Manes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Faubion v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API