LaBarge v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
This is an appeal in a post-conviction relief proceeding. Daniel LeBarge contends that the district court erred in summarily dismissing most of his claims for post-conviction relief. The order was certified for appeal under I.R.C.P. 54(b). For reasons which follow, we affirm the order.
In May 1985 Daniel LaBarge pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under the age of sixteen, a felony under former I.C. § 18-6607. In June 1985 the district court imposed a ten-year indeterminate sentence and retained jurisdiction so LaBarge could participate in the sex offender therapy program…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. FreemanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- Drapeau v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LarsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Nguyen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. PhillipsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
- Nguyen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994