Legal Opinion

LaBarge v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1989No. 17639PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This is an appeal in a post-conviction relief proceeding. Daniel LeBarge contends that the district court erred in summarily dismissing most of his claims for post-conviction relief. The order was certified for appeal under I.R.C.P. 54(b). For reasons which follow, we affirm the order.

In May 1985 Daniel LaBarge pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under the age of sixteen, a felony under former I.C. § 18-6607. In June 1985 the district court imposed a ten-year indeterminate sentence and retained jurisdiction so LaBarge could participate in the sex offender therapy program…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. FreemanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Drapeau v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LarsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Nguyen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. PhillipsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Nguyen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API