Legal Opinion
United States v. Schild
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 30, 2001No. 01-3002PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Steven Schild pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. He appeals his sentence, arguing that his offense level should not have been increased based on loss to the bank. We affirm. 1
Defendant was a customer of Benning-ton State Bank in Bennington, Kansas (BSB). During 19.94 and early 1995, he borrowed money from BSB to finance his cattle operation. When his line of credit with the bank ran out, defendant sold cattle out of trust and then filed false cattle count reports with the bank to conceal his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Kenneth E. HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alfred James SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. JanuszCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BurridgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Gary Martin BantaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. AryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Timothy J. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Yurek (Wendy)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.