Legal Opinion
United States v. Gary Martin Banta
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 20, 1997No. 96-4030PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Gary Martin Banta appeals his sentence for bank fraud and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1344. Our jurisdiction arises under 18 U.S.C. § 3742. On appeal, Defendant argues that the district court incorrectly applied § 2F1.1 of the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual (hereinafter Guidelines). Specifically, Defendant argues that the district court miscalculated the amount of loss to the victim, resulting in a higher total offense level. We review the district court’s factual determination of a U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1 loss for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Kenneth E. HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alfred James SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gary E. GalbraithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Johnnie Louis McAlpine AKA Louie McAlpineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BeltCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Frederick BryeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. FortierCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. SchildCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Roque DiazCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.