Legal Opinion

Doe v. Nevada Crossing, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 21, 1996No. 94-C-799 WPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.

The plaintiffs, John and Jane Doe, sued the defendants alleging that plaintiffs sustained severe physical, mental, and emotional injuries when they were violently and abusively assaulted while in their hotel room in the Nevada Crossing Hotel in Wendover, Nevada. In their initial pleadings, the plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, made no claim for loss of consortium arising from the assault. The trial in this matter is scheduled to begin in a short time, April 14, 1996. The plaintiffs are residents of the State of Utah and have been…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Michael Pagano v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Gagan v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gray F. Madison, Sr., and Elizabeth B. Madison, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs v. Deseret Livestock Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuenca v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  2. Vilela v. Office of Recovery ServicesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
  3. Watterson Construction Company v. International Door, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API