Gagan v. Norton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Mr. Gagan, a pro se litigant, appeals the decision of the district court dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the defendants, who are the Attorney General and an Assistant Attorney General of the State of Colorado, on the grounds that the defendants were entitled to absolute immunity for their actions in allegedly1 countermanding the order of a Colorado state court. We affirm with respect to the Attorney General, albeit for different reasons than those given by the district court, but we reverse and remand as to the Assistant Attorney General.
BACKGROUND
In…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Louise Whitney v. State of New Mexico Charles Patrick, Employee of the State of New Mexico John/jane Doe, Unknown Employees of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- David v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Colorado, Inc. , Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Jojola v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Jojola v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.