Neve v. Allen
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Mitchell District Court. ActioN by Allen against Neve and others to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring the case to this court. The opinion herein, filed October 5, 1895, contains a sufficient statement of the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Martin, 0. J. :
I. On March 21, 1887, John H. Allen filed his petition against John Neve and Wealthy A. Neve, alleging that he was and for a long time had been in possession of northeast quarter of southwest quarter, and northwest quarter of southeast quarter of section 27, township 6 south, of range 9 west, except the 13 acres, more or less, included in the town site of West Hampton; that he claimed title in fee to the premises, and that the defendants claimed an estate or interest therein adverse to the plaintiff, but that said claim of the defendants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scantlin v. AllisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Clark v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Giltenan v. LemertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hunter Milling Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Lehrling v. LehrlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Teisinger v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Greenley v. LillySupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Sullivan v. Albuquerque Nat. Trust & Savings BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947