Legal Opinion
Marriage & Family Center v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1991No. D013269PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
Charles E. Hansen (Dr. Hansen) and Susan Hansen, who are medical practitioners, and their medical business association, Marriage and Family Center (Center) (hereinafter collectively defendants), sought summary judgment based upon the contention that the complaint filed by Caroline De Pottel (hereinafter plaintiff) 1 for medical malpractice was clearly barred by the special statute of limitations provisions of Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 340.5. The trial court denied the motion, finding a triable issue of fact to be the time of occurrence of the effective damage such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Larcher v. WanlessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Hills v. AronsohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Rose v. FifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Katz ex rel. S.S. v. Children's Hospital of Orange CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Cline v. Ashland, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Warren v. SchecterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Drexler v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.