Legal Opinion

Sinkovich v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1926No. Appeal, 82PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for the death of her husband, who was killed by a bolt of lightning while standing in front of a window in their home. The trial resulted in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. Defendant appeals and submits for our con sideration, in support of the claim that judgment should be entered in its behalf, that there was no sufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s finding of negligence and no adequate proof of the causal connection between the negligence alleged and the death.

It is necessary to an understanding of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Rocap v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Western Telephone Corp. v. McCannTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Jones v. Monroe Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Western Telephone Corp. of Texas v. McCannTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
  5. Potter v. Glosser Bros. Dept. StoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API