Cheda v. Skinner
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
The appellant sued the appellee upon a promissory note. There was a plea of payment, the allegation being “that long prior to the commencement of this action the defendant fully paid said plaintiff the amount due on said note.” The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and the appeal is from a judgment rendered in the defendant’s favor.
Two specifications of error are presented: 1. That the court erred in overruling the plaintiff’s objection to the introduction of evidence in support of the defendant’s plea of payment;, and 2. That the judgment is contrary to the evidence. To…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wells's Adm'x v. FairbankTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Wood v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Tatum v. MassieOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Evans v. GlencrossArizona Supreme Court · 1894
- Scott v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Old Dominion Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Shaffer v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1912
- Skaggs v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Edwin K. Williams & Co., Inc. v. Edwin K. Williams & Co.-E.District Court, C.D. California · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.