Wood v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. Case. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMabston, J.
The defendant requested the court to charge the jury that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover and their verdict must therefore be for the defendant. The court refused to so charge and this is alleged as error.
The bill of exceptions does not purport to give all the evidence or even the substance thereof; the presumption therefore would be that the evidence justified the rulings. There is however sufficient evidence set forth in the record to show that the defendant was not entitled to have the request made given.
The plaintiff was a passenger upon a train of the defendant, and as it…
2Cited by13 opinions
- McGee v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Sherwood v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Eisentrager v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Selman v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. QuinkertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.