Legal Opinion

Ring v. Minnesota Road Builders, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 1962No. 38,548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from orders of the trial court denying motions for amended findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment or for a new trial. The result must turn upon the construction of an excavation contract.

The plaintiffs Martin Ring, Harold Ring, and Colonial Realty, Inc., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the landowners, entered into a contract with Minnesota Road Builders, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as the contractor, by which it was agreed that the contractor would undertake to do certain work in the leveling and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Combined Insurance Co. of America v. BodeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Wick v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Lucas v. Ganley Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Wiseth v. Goodridge Farmers Elevator & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Sitterley v. Gray Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Delzer Construction Co. v. South Dakota State Board of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Eickhof Construction Company v. City of GraftonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API