Legal Opinion

Eickhof Construction Company v. City of Grafton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1963No. 8072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Judge.

In this case the plaintiff, Eickhof Construction Company, sued the defendant, City of Grafton, basing its action on the terms of a written construction contract with the City, alleging that $11,435.50, plus interest, was due and owing it for pit run gravel which it had furnished the City in connection with the construction of a water treatment and water distribution plant. The defendant interposed an answer denying this obligation, asserting it had paid the contract in full, that $518.00 of this payment was for pit run gravel furnished in the project which its engineer had…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aetna Indemnity, Co. v. John WatersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Gunsch v. GunschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Shong v. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re Hendricks'estateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. McGuire v. City of Rapid CitySupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moorhead Construction Co., Inc., a Corporation, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. City of Grand Forks, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Matteson v. PolanchekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API