Legal Opinion

Draim v. Virtual Geosatellite Holdings, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 1, 2009No. Civil Action 01-2690 (JMF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1992-1997

1. On November 1, 1992, Draim was hired as a consultant by Mobile Communications Holdings, Incorporated (“MCHI”) pursuant to a written consulting agreement dated November 1, 1992. Trial Transcript (“Tr.”) at 14.

2. Draim worked for MCHI as a consultant through June 30, 1997. Tr. at 16. He was paid by the hour. Tr. at 15.

3. The consulting agreement provided that Draim would receive $2,000 for each patent application filed and $10,000 for the successful…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Willoughby v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Kerrigan v. Britches of Georgetowne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Sullivan v. Heritage FoundationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. National Railroad Passenger v. Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Economic Research Services, Inc. v. Resolution Economics, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Phillips v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. Howard v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API