Kimble v. City of Page
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Judge.
¶ 1 The City of Page (the “City”) appeals from the superior court’s grant of special action relief to an employee of the City, ordering that he be reinstated by the City Manager to his former position. We must determine whether that court correctly interpreted the City’s Personnel Rules in light of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 9-303(B)(1996) and the City’s ordinance creating the office of City Manager. We affirm one portion of the superior court’s ruling and in all other respects reverse its grant of relief to the employee.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Inlet Associates v. Assateague House Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Ames v. SmootAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Bilagody v. ThorneycroftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Marlar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bogdanski v. BudzikWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. RabyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Sanderson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Thomas and King, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.