Legal Opinion
Marlar v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 17, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 6503PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Judge.
In this appeal, we are called upon to determine the propriety of certain actions taken by an agency within the Arizona Department of Economic Security (DES) which administers the Business Enterprises Program, Services for the Blind (BEP). The facts necessary for the disposition of this appeal are as follows.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff-appellee James Floyd Marlar (Marlar) is an independent businessman, licensed to operate a food service facility in a government building, pursuant to a federally-funded vocational rehabilitation program for the blind authorized under the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sahf v. Lake Havasu City Ass'n for the Retarded & HandicappedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- U.S. Parking Systems v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Weitz Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Cochise County v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.