Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Speck

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1928No. 6170PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The question as to who are parties to an action is generally to be determined by inspection of the whole record, including the petition, prayer for process, process, return of the sheriff, etc. Wallace v. Wallace, 142 Ga. 408 (83 S. E. 113); John Holland Pen Co. v. Williams, 7 Ga. App. 173 (66 S. E. 540); Wadley v. Oertel, 140 Ga. 326 (78 S. E. 912); Trust Company of Georgia v. Wallace, 143 Ga. 214 (84 S. E. 538). It is a recognized rule of law in this State that a judgment rendered against one sued as an individual is not conclusive of any right he may have in his representative capacity…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neal-Millard Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Worthy v. CheathamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Wadley v. OertelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. John Holland Gold Pen Co. v. Williams & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walden v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Center v. ArpSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Duke v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Smith Realty Company v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API