Legal Opinion
Walden v. Nichols
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 11, 1948No. 16345PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Groves, Justice.
The ground of demurrer assailing the petition for indefiniteness as to the capacity in which C. 0. Walden was named as defendant, whether individually or as Treasurer of Floyd County, is without merit. The second paragraph alleged “That C. 0. Walden is a resident of Floyd County, Georgia, and is the duly elected and qualified treasurer of said county.” It was alleged in paragraph 8: “Petitioner shows that it is the official duty of said treasurer to pay the aforesaid orders.” While other paragraphs referred to the defendant simply as “said C. 0. Walden,” we do not see how the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GlawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Third National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Worthy v. CheathamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Walden v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Navistar International Transportation Corp. v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Pharr v. WoodallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Manning v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Smith Realty Company v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.