Blum v. Bruggemann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, August M. Bruggemann, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day of September, 1900, striking out his answer as sham and frivolous.
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
Action to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the defendant Shapiro, to secure the payment at a time therein specified, of a certain sum. -with interest, executed and delivered to the plaintiff a bond secured by a mortgage upon the real estate described in the complaint; that after the execution of the bond and mortgage, Shapiro and wife conveyed the real estate to the defendant Bruggemann, who covenanted in his deed to,, and thereby did, assume the payment of the mortgage; that the bond had not been paid, and that according to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wayland v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Armstrong v. DanahyNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Robertson v. Rockland Cemetery Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Pittenger v. Southern Tier Masonic Relief Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Bedlow v. StillwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seastrom, Inc. v. Amick Construction Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Blum v. BruggemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901