Armstrong v. Danahy
New York Supreme Court
Action by Charles B. Armstrong, as receiver of the Buffalo Railway Supply Company, against James Danahy. Defendant moves for a new trial on exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance at general term, after a verdict directed in favor of plaintiff at circuit. Denied.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, as receiver of the Buffalo Railway Supply Company, to recover of the defendant $500, his subscription to the capital stock of the company. The company was organized on the 30th day of September, 1890, as a domestic corporation, under the laws of the state of New York. By an order of this court dated the 14th day of November, 1892, the corporation was dissolved, and the plaintiff was duly appointed receiver, and by an order of the court dated the 18th day of November, 1892, he was directed, as such receiver, to enforce the collection of all the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Beals v. Buffalo Expanded Metal Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Yonkers Gazette Co. v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Beals v. Buffalo Expanded Metal Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Pueblo v. Bautista GalarzaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1930
- Koster v. PainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.